Numbers, Narratives, and New Perspectives

Inspirations from the ‘Irish Women Playwrights and Theatremakers’ Conference

by Dr Anna Pilz (UCC)


Irish Women Playwrights and TheatremakersThere was a palpable sense of historical significance in the air when activists, theatre practitioners as well as national and international scholars descended upon the Drama & Theatre Studies Department at Mary Immaculate College in Limerick for the ‘Irish Women Playwrights and Theatremakers’ (8-10 June) conference.

The three-day event was filled with stimulating papers, compelling plenaries, evocative performances, and exchanges. Appropriately and importantly, the conference had kicked off only a day after the launch of the report Gender Counts: An Analysis of Gender in Irish Theatre 2006-2015 thanks to the magnificent and relentless work of the research committee of the #WakingTheFeminists movement.

Gender Counts confirmed and revealed in black and white numbers the marginalisation of women in Irish theatre between 2006 and 2015. While the numbers speak loud and clear, the conference offered an excellent platform to enmesh quantitative analysis with qualitative research and personal experiences. In many ways, it was not only a moment to voice frustrations and call for change, but it was also a three-day recognition of women’s central contribution to Irish theatre, both at home and abroad.

Focusing on the top ten theatre organisations that receive Arts Council funding, Gender Counts highlights the astoundingly low percentage of female playwrights; only 28% of authors employed between 2006 and 2015 were women¹. How many, I wondered, Irish female playwrights were there between 1880 and 1910? Maud Gonne, Constance Markievicz, Eva Gore-Booth, Alice Milligan, Lady Gregory, and Winifred Letts come to mind. But are those representative? In 1892, the Daily Graphic noted that Irish fiction, at that moment, was ‘practically in the hands of Irish women’². Where, however, were Irish women playwrights? The 28% mentioned above only account for those who made it to the stage; but what about the percentage of plays written that were never (or rarely) encountered by a theatre audience?

There was a recognisable gap between Dr David Clare’s opening paper on Frances Sheridan, Elizabeth Griffith, Mary Balfour, and Maria Edgeworth in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries and Lady Gregory’s drama in the early twentieth century. Clare productively pointed to the loss of texts by Irish women playwrights in the earlier period: texts that either never made it to publication or texts that have suffered from a subsequent neglect of scholarly editions such as the plays by Edgeworth. The identification and retrieval of such texts is important to gain a fuller understanding of women’s contribution to the dramatic tradition. And it also called to mind discussions at the inaugural conference of the ‘Irish Women Writers 1880-1910 Network’ in November 2016 where one potential initiative of the network could be in bringing works back into print via inclusion in Tramp Press’s Recovered Voices Series.


For scholarship on women’s writing, the plenaries by Dr Cathy Leeney and Dr Melissa Sihra were particularly thought-provoking in that they argued respectively for “new ways of seeing” and a “tilting of the lens” to bring to light new insights and important correctives to established narratives of literary history. Both plenaries equally stressed the importance of linking past and present, to consider points of connection and disconnection.


Leeney’s excellent plenary on “Waking up to Theatrical Aesthetics: Women’s Way of Looking”, highlighted the value of historical research in that it is an act of ‘recovery of the roots of self’; historical research assists in challenging and rejecting established narratives. Such a rejection of established narratives was most provocatively demonstrated in Sihra’s magnificent and inspired plenary titled “Beyond Token Women: Towards a Matriarchal Lineage from Lady Gregory to Marina Carr” which rendered Gregory not simply co-founder and playwright, but precursor to Synge, Beckett, Murphy and Carr in dramatic craft, language, and themes. Such levelling of the field helpfully disrupts Irish theatre history as we know it and as we find it reiterated in survey texts such as The Oxford Handbook of Modern Irish Theatre.


A personal highlight for me, Sihra’s historically grounded argument was poignant in many ways. For one thing, I myself had engaged in quantitative research by tallying up performances of Gregory’s plays between the opening of the Abbey in 1904 to the playwright’s death in 1932, and for the period from 1933 to 2011. Comparing the figures to performances of plays by her co-directors of the early Abbey, W.B. Yeats and J.M. Synge post Gregory’s death, I was counting from high visibility to invisibility. Yet such harsh numbers present only part of a picture that requires further unpacking. And in terms of literary history, that unpacking often requires diligent journeys into archives.


In fact, the wealth of archival research presented in numerous papers at the conference pointed to the difficulties of researching women’s lives and writings that requires creativity in sources. After all, it is not always easy to trace women within archival collections and more often than not is necessitated by a compilation of sources from birth, marriage and death certificates, letters, diaries, periodicals and newspapers. Yet hunting archival collections pays off; there was a moment of gasping astonishment and admiration for Dr Ciara O’Dowd’s scholarship on the Abbey actress and later artistic director Ria Mooney. O’Dowd discovered and revealed the effectiveness of fresh perspectives which, in this instance, resulted in a re-framing of Mooney’s work. While Mooney as a woman in Irish theatre history is associated, primarily, with the role of the prostitute Rosie Redmond in Seán O’Casey’s The Plough and the Stars, as an Irish woman in a more globalized theatre world, Rooney is lauded as Assistant Director to the acclaimed Eva Le Galienne on Broadway in the late 1920s and early 1930s.


This leads to one of the over-arching threads across papers and across periods. I was struck by the repeated references to the success of Irish women playwrights on the international stage while facing rejection at home. This would seem to suggest two very different strands of narrative: one concerning women and Irish theatre which is characterised by hardship, marginalisation, and depreciation; the other about Irish women and theatre which appears to point to a rather different narrative that is filled with cultural exchange, opportunity, and success. These two narrative frameworks – women and Irish theatre versus Irish women and theatre – signal the importance of framing and point of view. Of course, this is somewhat oversimplifying a complex relationship. But to an extent, it is a question of scale and placing (Irish) women writers – of theatre or otherwise – within wider European and transnational contexts. Again, Gregory is a case in point. In a fruitful discussion with PhD candidate Justine Nakase (NUI Galway), who directed Gregory’s play Grania in 2016 (a play that was never staged during Gregory’s life-time³), it emerged that perceptions of Gregory’s stuffiness might be due to some kind of cultural blindness and national baggage that international theatre practitioners are free of. For women’s literary history more broadly, it would seem that transnational perspectives have much to offer.

Dr Anna Pilz (UCC)

If you have any suggestions for the blog or would like to submit a post email Dr Deirdre Flynn

  1. Brenda Donohue, Ciara O’Dowd, Tanya Dean, Ciara Murphy, Kathleen Cawley, Kate Harris, Gender Counts: An Analysis of Gender in Irish Theatre 2006-2015 (2017) p. 6.
  2. ‘Irish Fiction’, Daily Graphic (5 October 1891), quoted in Gifford Lewis (ed.), The Selected Letters of Somerville and Ross (London: Faber & Faber, 1989), p. 178.
  3. Nakase’s production of Gregory’s Grania premiered on 28 January 2016 to launch the Galway-based #wakingthefeministswest season.

From Maud Gonne to Bathing-suits and Striptease Culture

By Dr Clare Gorman

woirnWaterford Institute of Technology hosted the first ever Women On Ireland Research Network interdisciplinary conference earlier this month. National and International speakers gathered over the two-day event to discuss and share research that is being carried out on the role, representation and perception of women within Ireland. For the first time in a long time we had research being presented on all aspects of women across a broad range of disciplines. Each paper was ‘rocking the system’, ‘shaking the status quo’ and identifying the challenges faced by women past and present.

The jam packed two days facilitated 12 panels on topics ranging from sports/leisurewear, porn, sex, sex education and women and ageing. The issue of gender within culinary arts was discussed by Mary Farrell (DIT) and the question raised as to ‘why women chefs remain poorly represented at top culinary positions in Ireland specifically?’ This underrepresentation of women is a common theme that seeps into other disciplines, like science and sport. As Dr. Claire Murray pointed out in her paper, Where are Ireland’s Women in Science – ‘It is a curious fact that the Irish Chemistry Leaving Certificate and University Curricula tell the story of a molecule by highlighting all the of the men who were wrong about it rather than the one Irish women who was right’. And when it comes to sport, Dr. Brenda Murphy, insists that ‘images of female bodies become hypersexualised, commodified, produced and reproduced into spectacles of unattainable beauty ideals’.

More traditional papers were presented on the topic of nationalism and the role of women within the 1916 rising. Where the ‘ongoing radicalising of women’s organisations and what effect that has on Irishwomen more generally in the period 1917-1919’ was presented by Dr. Mary McAuliffe. A quote used by Dr. Deirdre Flynn from Kevin Barry’s City of Bohane, ‘It was better if he didn’t look at her’, raised the topic of women and ageing. Timely papers on the Magdalene survivors, sexual consent and contemporary Irish motherhood all formed part of the conversation over the two days. 

These zestful papers where interjected by five keynote speakers. Professor Louise Ryan (University of Sheffield), gave a brilliant keynote on stories of Irish migrants to London and the factors that cause people to leave Ireland in the first place. Professor Ann Fogarty (University College Dublin), looked at contemporary Irish women’s writing. She specifically analysed the writer Eimear McBride and the idea of women and identity within McBride’s work. Dr. Máire Leane (University College Cork), gave a fascinating paper on the representation of adolescent female sexuality in Ireland. The serious question of girls being oversexualised was raised. Dr. Mary Condren (Trinity College Dublin), finished the keynotes by discussing why are women either depicted as angels or sinister temptresses within mythologies. Lastly, the writer Evelyn Conlon shared some funny and humorous stories from her collection Telling published by Books Upstairs.

The two days concluded with a spirited roundtable discussion which looked at women within academia and beyond. This discussion highlighted the prejudice regularly endured by women yesterday and today in all aspects of life. It inspired us all that fighting supervillains is easy but fighting misogyny is the real challenge.

Dr. Clare Gorman, (organiser) is a Lecturer at the School of Humanities, Waterford Institute of Technology


If you would like to submit a blog email the details here.


Occluded Narratives

Occluded Narratives: Researching Irish Women’s Writing 1880-1910

26 November 2016, Mary Immaculate College, Limerick

The diverse and multi-disciplinary body of material contained in The Field Day Anthology Volumes IV and V: Women’s Writing and Traditions (2002) triggered a crucial reappraisal of canonical exclusions. It also engendered numerous retrieval projects on ‘literary absentees’ from the archives of late nineteenth and early twentieth-century Irish women’s writing. Scholars working in this field, Margaret Kelleher, Gerardine Meaney, Rolf Loeber and Magda Stouthamer-Loeber, James H. Murphy, John Wilson Foster, Heidi Hansson, Tina O’ Toole and many others have made pioneering contributions to what is now a growing body of scholarship. Constructing new critical paradigms and paying attention to neglected writers and genres has expanded our understanding of this period and opened up new spaces for scholarly dialogue.

Our aims in organising this symposium in many ways seek to further such work. They include:

  1. The identification and connection of scholars working in the field of recovery, rediscovery and reassessment of hitherto neglected and forgotten Irish women writers working at the turn of the century in Ireland, England and further afield. This writing need not be exclusively literary – the aim is to establish an interdisciplinary network where scholars working in different fields but focused on the same period might exchange ideas.
  1. The inauguration of a network for the study of ‘Irish Women’s Writing 1880-1910’ which has a permanent digital presence as a means of sharing information.
  1. Laying the groundwork for a larger international conference in 2017/18.

The proposed dates, 1880-1910 are not exclusive and scholars working on writers publishing slightly outside these fields will be welcome to attend.

Follow us on Facebook.